Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bernarda Pera vs Ingrid Neel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pera vs Neel analysis and find out who is favored!
Bernarda Pera vs Ingrid Neel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pera 1 - 0 Neel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pera has won 42.59% of points on their second serve, while Neel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pera, in recent form, has won 54.54% of their opponent's second serve points, while Neel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pera has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Neel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pera has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Neel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pera has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 250/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Neel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 47/ 40), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Pera has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9), where as Neel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pera winning 1 times and Neel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pera winning 2 and Neel winning 0. The last match between Pera and Neel was at the Daytona Beach, 13-01-2016, First, Clay with Bernarda Pera getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pera and Neel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pera winning 0 times and Neel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pera winning 0, and Neel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pera has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.84 while Neel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pera has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Neel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pera has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Neel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
106
Rank
27
High
29
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
890
Rank
501
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
62% (409-252)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-91)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,383,723
Career Prize Money
$3,725
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Bernarda Pera vs Ingrid Neel For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pera VS Neel
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Bernarda Pera | Ingrid Neel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (40/74) | 64% (29/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (22/40) | 48% (14/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 25% (4/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (27/45) | 45% (33/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Bernarda Pera
Player
Ingrid Neel
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bernarda Pera | Ingrid Neel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (45/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (378/370) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 163 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:17 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 127.86 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1554/2418) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (977/1554) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (368/864) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (144/320) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1135/2485) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (20/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Bernarda Pera Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bernarda Pera
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
107)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Bernarda Pera
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Bernarda Pera
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Caroline Dolehide
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Anna Bondar
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Heather Watson
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Bernarda Pera
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Bernarda Pera
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
31 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Renata Zarazua
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ingrid Neel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Deborah Chiesa
Player
Ingrid Neel
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Ingrid Neel
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Ingrid Neel
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Ingrid Neel
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Ingrid Neel
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vlada Koval
Player
Ingrid Neel
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Ingrid Neel
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Ingrid Neel
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Ingrid Neel
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Pera Vs Neel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pera are available here and Neel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
